A week-to-week schedule allows people who have busy lives to play tournaments, as well as being more accessible for those who live in varying timezones (you would hard pressed to see Australians participate in a 5pm EDT tournament, as seen with Smogon Tour).
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
-
Congrats to the winners of the 2023 Smog Awards!
Smogon Simple Questions & Suggestions Thread
- Thread starter Quite Quiet
- Start date
Speaking on behalf of random battles, the reason all major tournaments are run on a weekly schedule on forums is for inclusivity. Top random battles players come from all around the world, so timezones make a live event have outright a lower standard of gameplay because many top players would be unable to attend, and also include lots of ages (but mainly older) which would further restrict this as people have real life responsibilities that restrict the time they can be available for. High level gameplay also takes a long time -- the average set takes at minimum 30 minutes and is usually more like 40-50 -- meaning that a live tournament of BO3 sets would be a whole-day event since there are many rounds. Not only does this limit inclusivity further, but actually sounds way less fun and enjoyable, and more tiring, to play in, which would further limit the competivity of the tournament.
I would imagine most of these reasons also apply to teambuilt formats.
WRT lots of matches being settled by activity, live tournaments wouldn't actually fix this because people will sign up to the tournaments and not attend. It is likelier to also have more dropouts and activity calls in later rounds, as lots of people will sign up to the tournament to play a few games while always intending to go to sleep part-way through, or actual emergencies could happen which require their attention more urgently than a for-fun tournament does. Live tournaments are harmful to games getting done, not beneficial. If people can't play a tournament set in a week, they're probably not committed enough to attend a live tournament and see it through. Scheduling isn't difficult.
I'd like to pick at your brain some more with more questions, if you don't mind; If you feel this is too argumentative, feel free to tell me and I will delete this post:
A lot of tournaments in most competitive videogames consider maintaining mental and being able to play a lot at a given time to be a serious competitive element to their games, and players that cannot play for hours without losing their luster are docked points by most people for this. VGC tournaments in-person for instance are all a long day affair, and in a lot of player's accounts of how they did, their mental throughout the day as a competitor is a big element of their performance.
For a personal example, I play competitive Splatoon, a 4v4 shooter. Even losing the tournament, it will likely take hours for our run as a team to finish. Keeping mental and not getting tired throughout the stretches of pools, loser's bracket, winners etc. is considered a big strength as a player, and actively coveted.
I can see the point of timezones though, especially as a player who has been unable to play in certain teams or events because of timezone conflicts. But as I mentioned, it seems that Smogon has a big issue with activity wins/losses? There is a Policy Review thread active about it, currently.
What makes Smogon tend to not care for this element in competitive tournaments?
I edited my post after posting and it covers some of this haha but :P
I think the reason just comes down to that Smogon prioritises skill at the game over any other factor. We still have the mental fortitude testing -- particularly as in many tournaments (and most rands tournaments) later rounds in single elim will become best of 5, and in team tournaments the main formats will have a best of 5 slot. Best of 3 is, in itself, a pretty time-consuming and tiring affair sometimes.
I don't actually think players in other tournaments perceive being able to play a lot on one big event day as an element of skill at the game. They do consider it an element of being good at that game competitively, because the only way for those games' events to run are as major in-person events. But that's not game skill, and shouldn't be misconstrued as such. If someone in a video game that usually runs in-person events had a 100% winrate against the best players in the world, but only played 1 series a day, no one would claim they were bad at the game. They'd recognise their skill while also understanding that the tournament structure is bad for them. EDIT: Also yeah it doesn't only refer to in-person; Splatoon and Pokémon Unite and such are online event days because you have to arrange to all play together as a team anyway. Pokémon doesn't have that problem either.
So Smogon doesn't run major live tournaments simply for the reason that it doesn't have to. Having the stamina to play for 10 hours a day isn't something that makes you better at the game Pokémon. It would make you better at 10 hour in-person Pokémon tournaments, but that's the only thing it would make you better at.
The activity wins thread in Tournament Policy isn't actually about activity wins or losses, really. It's about decorum regarding emergencies. It's kind of a stupid thread IMO because emergencies that happen 30 seconds or even during a series are still valid. If your house sets on fire in the finals of OST you shouldn't lose because you timed out in the game while putting it out. Pokémon has lots of activity wins and losses in the first round, and then a few hold-overs in the second round, of major tournaments. After that it dwindles a lot, and so in large tournaments like random battles usually has, activity wins and losses are basically not a thing from round 4 or on, and at that point there's still a huge number of players in it. Those players get to have fun and not be playing 9 hours into the tournament by the time they get to finals, which lets them show off their skill. I just have no idea why it would be desirable for that not to be the case when it doesn't have to be.
Why make the player experience worse just to test which players can best deal with it being worse?
everyone else has basically answered, but yeah. to put it as simply as possible, not everyone can play at the exact same time and scheduling that with the size of some tours just absolutely is not feasible whatsoever
why is double posting (and beyond) generally frowned upon?
A lot of times, double posting can be avoided by the user editing their post for their additional question or information added. It's frowned upon because it tends to flood threads with questions or information that could be relayed within 2-3 additional lines in a post.
users can use "points" determined by what badges they have (and other things, like being room or global staff on PS!) to buy certain rewards on PS! like getting your name color changed, getting a custom avatar, claiming a defunct username, etc
I can't seem to like posts. Apparently it should be right next to "Reply", but it just doesn't show up for me:
Did/Does anyone else have this issue? Any ideas on how to fix this/where to ask for more help?
Thanks!
Did/Does anyone else have this issue? Any ideas on how to fix this/where to ask for more help?
Thanks!
likes are enabled after 5 or 10 posts I don't remember which. it's to discourage people from making a ton of new accounts to boost their ratio and so that botting doesn't become prevalent when voting is involved.
That makes sense, thanks! Time for me to post a bit then I guess
how many points for each badge? how many points is a cus avatar?
get a badge and all of this information will become available to you! until then you gotta stick to wondering...
Is there somewhere in this fórum, or some other related fórum, where I can speak about hackrooms?
Are there any strict requirements for pre-contributor or is it based on when someone notices you contributing to the community?
They can vary based on quality, quantity, and similar such factors + you can have contributions from several sections all count towards something that's basically a starter badge.
Can unbadged users apply for the GP or QC teams of a specific forum?
GP isn't subforum specific, but otherwise yes.
Is there any way for unbadged users to make a thread in policy review? I tried submitting a post request yesterday, but it requires you to link a thread. I can assure this is no joke post -- it's about addressing 10+ year old issues with the usage stats based on research I've done for 1.5 years.
We discussed this internally - you should be able to post in PR now.
pokemonisfun
Banned deucer.
totally off the cuff but I think this could help with many projects: often times people sign up for a project or tour in a thread, then the host wants to ping everyone. Idk, personally I'd find it useful if there was a way to ping everyone in the thread with a single @ mention. Not sure if it's possible on these forums, but just a suggestion if it is.
Maybe only let the OP do it or make a clear punishment for those who abuse it if you let anyone do it.
Maybe only let the OP do it or make a clear punishment for those who abuse it if you let anyone do it.
my suggestion:
allow the creator of a thread to request "Ping Access" (either via a thread or button idk) maybe with a reason as to why, or moderator checks thread
if allowed the thread creator can do this
pokemonisfun
Banned deucer.
can mods/supermods/admins see things we post in sandbox? Just you know...dont want to reveal teams/prep to them! I know it says original poster onlybut just asking.
Senior staff has stated before they do not have access but can give themselves access if they ever need it for whatever reason