Deck Knight
Blast Off At The Speed Of Light! That's Right!
Approved by popular demand and big Deck Knight
I have updated the policy review index to include all the threads leading up to CAP 1.
Our last few Policy Review threads were primarily about the transition to 5th Gen, and basically included a few pro forma threads as well as announcements and notes on the trajectory of the forum going forward.
In general, our only restriction on PR threads is that you need an approval of a moderator to post it, and the thread should discuss some portion of the process with real insight and an actual solution. PR threads are not sounding boards for complaints, they are meant to propose something.
I don't really think the definition of PR or how they are put into action is the real issue, but it was brought up, so in this case I will allow some discussion if it. Is it by nature the last part of the process we think about, since it happens inbetween actual projects.
So to summarize, I'm not sure where Aerodactyl Legend and others who brought this up in the getting CAP back on track thread want to go with this, but the forum is now available if you have any particular constructive criticisms or suggestions.
As a note, the above still applies, however in this thread we are welcoming people who might have less official experience due to our project fits and starts. If you were around through Voodoom and/or Tomohawk, that's a sufficient qualification for "experienced" for the purposes of this thread.If you are not an experienced member of the CAP community, it is strongly recommended that you do not post in this thread.
This thread is intended to contain intelligent discussion and commentary by experienced members of the CAP project regarding CAP policy, process, and rules. As such, the content of this thread will be moderated more strictly than other threads on the forum. The posting rules for Policy Review threads are contained here.
I have updated the policy review index to include all the threads leading up to CAP 1.
Our last few Policy Review threads were primarily about the transition to 5th Gen, and basically included a few pro forma threads as well as announcements and notes on the trajectory of the forum going forward.
In general, our only restriction on PR threads is that you need an approval of a moderator to post it, and the thread should discuss some portion of the process with real insight and an actual solution. PR threads are not sounding boards for complaints, they are meant to propose something.
I don't really think the definition of PR or how they are put into action is the real issue, but it was brought up, so in this case I will allow some discussion if it. Is it by nature the last part of the process we think about, since it happens inbetween actual projects.
So to summarize, I'm not sure where Aerodactyl Legend and others who brought this up in the getting CAP back on track thread want to go with this, but the forum is now available if you have any particular constructive criticisms or suggestions.