SparksBlade
Community Leader
pm any staff member, if one can't help you with it you'll prolly be redirected to someone to can help
Oh okay, sorry. So it's the Smogon confirm link that it's not running.Are you reading what I'm posting? I had a link to the email and an error message saying that my password couldn't be retrieved.
That request could be too much old and no longer valid. You haven't generate it now but some time ago. I think you have to ask to admin.I did that already...
Mega gardevoir, mega Houndoom, mega gyarados, and Kyurem-b are good choices.Good stall breakers? It's destroying me on the suspect ladder :(
CM or 4 Attacks Landorus-I sets also work to decent effect (though on the suspect ladder Giratina-O is probably what's stopping you). Most of the above noted mons can break it though, so I can at least vouch for their effectiveness.Good stall breakers? It's destroying me on the suspect ladder :(
A boring meta where you always see the same pokemon over and over again.What is a stale meta?
Yeah this isn't exactly true. It's a meta where creativity isn't allowed to flourish due to certain meta-game trends and extreme team-building restrictions.A boring meta where you always see the same pokemon over and over again.
Some may be retested when the meta stabilizes if the community was split at the time, but for some like Mega Lucario and Mega Mawile it's less likely because most players were pretty adamant about them being bannedIs there a chance for Pokemon to be unbanned in ORAS, although they were banned in XY? For ex. Genesect, Aegi and M-Luc are IMO pokis, that could be suspect tested in OU again.
Not entirely sure where you're going with this. As far as I can tell, you want to create a ladder where things that are broken now are banned and we bring back stuff that was already deemed broken into the tier. If I'm understanding you correctly, I really doubt this will ever happen. The closest you'll probably get to this is the no Mega Ladder, which at least removes the Megas which are arguably the biggest causes of the power creep.In addition: Is there a possibility to split OU into 2 tiers? I mean current OU is total garbage and the power creep ORAS delivered doesn't help either xD SO why not just make a new tier next to OU which is some kind of SubOU where all the broken pokis are banned (or make a new one called SubUber, so that all the broken stuff could be banned from OU)? I mean OU just got sooooo big, we really need a new tier in-between. This way we could also unban some of the Pokis from Uber (Aegi/ Gene/ M-Luc).
Not even close xDNot entirely sure where you're going with this. As far as I can tell, you want to create a ladder where things that are broken now are banned and we bring back stuff that was already deemed broken into the tier. If I'm understanding you correctly, I really doubt this will ever happen. The closest you'll probably get to this is the no Mega Ladder, which at least removes the Megas which are arguably the biggest causes of the power creep.
Except we never justified those megas as being broken... That's just your opinion on those specific pokemon which you have a hard time dealing with. Basically what you're saying is we'd suspect everything we have problems dealing with and just make a seperate metagame without them.Not even close xD
What I'm basically saying is, that OU has sooooooo many threats, that making this tier balanced (outside of banning all the broken Megas) is just impossible. The best way would be to split OU into 2 different tiers, let's say into OUup and OUdown. OUup would basically be the OU of today. OUdown would be a "balanced" version of OU, where Pokis like M-Metagross/ M-Altaria/ Lando-T etc are banned, but other pokis are still there (like M-Alakazam/ Tran/ M-Lop etc.).
I just think that the "balanced" OU we once knew is a thing of the past will never happen again. We have to split OU into 2 tiers and OUdown would be the closest to what most people wanted as a "balanced OU".
IN ADDITION (this was just a guess) in OUup we could unban some Pokis from Uber like Aegi or Genesect.
Okay, that makes a little more sense. Let me address this more thoroughly.Not even close xD
What I'm basically saying is, that OU has sooooooo many threats, that making this tier balanced (outside of banning all the broken Megas) is just impossible. The best way would be to split OU into 2 different tiers, let's say into OUup and OUdown. OUup would basically be the OU of today. OUdown would be a "balanced" version of OU, where Pokis like M-Metagross/ M-Altaria/ Lando-T etc are banned, but other pokis are still there (like M-Alakazam/ Tran/ M-Lop etc.).
I just think that the "balanced" OU we once knew is a thing of the past will never happen again. We have to split OU into 2 tiers and OUdown would be the closest to what most people wanted as a "balanced OU".
IN ADDITION (this was just a guess) in OUup we could unban some Pokis from Uber like Aegi or Genesect.
WTF, what are you talking about? Read my post again xDExcept we never justified those megas as being broken... That's just your opinion on those specific pokemon which you have a hard time dealing with. Basically what you're saying is we'd suspect everything we have problems dealing with and just make a seperate metagame without them.
That's the thing I personally am not sure about either. But what would we lose from testing this "new tier"? We could start with randomly "banning" some Pokis from OUdown and see how it develops. Sep by step we could change a few things (like banning or unbanning certain pokes) Maybe after 1-2 months those 2 tiers (OUup & OUdown) will establish themselves? I mean, we won't lose anything from testing it and personally I don't think it is a bad idea to solve this "OU is far from balanced"-problem.Okay, that makes a little more sense. Let me address this more thoroughly.
The big issue I see with this idea is this: how are you going to determine what is too broken for OUdown? Right now OU and UU are split using usage data because it's the most objective data we can use. However, if we're splitting OU, then we'd likely need another set of criteria. We can use usage data, but what do you make the cut-off point? There are a lot of mons with high usage values that aren't necessarily broken like Garchomp and Clefable. I don't know about you, but I don't see a good cut-off percentage that captures the good mons you want banned without OUup taking a bunch of random non-broken mons with it. You could have a council determine what's broken, but creating tiers based entirely on a council's decision is very subjective and would displease a huge portion of the player base.
There's also the issue of whether it's worth the effort to bother maintaining the tier. The difference between OU and UU (not counting BL mons) is about 50 mons. Just how many mons do you want banned from OUdown? If you ban too many OUdown is UU with a crapton of things they have to ban. Ban too few and you're just playing OU with random mons stripped from the tier. Even if you ban 20, that's a pretty small difference between usage-based tiers considering most tiers ban a little under 60 mons by usage. It's similar to why there's no tier between OU and Ubers: the difference in the tier is so small that there isn't a large enough pool of supporters to merit the extra effort.
I could, but all you get as an answer (if you are a rather new and uinexperienced member) is that you don't hold the whip hand xDZyrax Just PM Haunter or Ginga or someone like that at this point. This is SQSA, not theoretical tiering discussion.
252 HP / 136 Def / 120 Spe with a Bold nature is what would probably be best. Speed creeps SDef Gliscor.Anyone know what spread is used for SubCM Giratina-O?
Just curious, why invest in G-Os HP when its base stat is so absurdly high?252 HP / 136 Def / 120 Spe with a Bold nature is what would probably be best. Speed creeps SDef Gliscor.
Because... I'm lazy? There's probably bulk benchmarks but I only did speed creeping.Just curious, why invest in G-Os HP when its base stat is so absurdly high?