Necturna Rare Candy

[FMD]

Relevant post.

What should be done about Rare Candy Necturna?
A) Rare Candy boosts her SpDef by 1. (no change)
B) Rare Candy boosts her Atk by 1.
C) Rare Candy boosts both her Atk and SpDef by 1. (remove the special clause from Rare Candy's description)

If A or B wins, should this precedent apply to other 23 BRT Pokemon?
A) Yes.
B) No.

Relevant Pokemon (23 BRT, non-unique signature item, tied highest stat):
Registeel (Everstone, Def/SpDef)
Azelf (Everstone, Atk/SpAtk)
Aria Meloetta (Everstone, SpAtk/SpDef)
Genesect (Everstone, Atk/SpAtk)
Pheromosa (Everstone, Atk/SpAtk)

It's a short list and they're all under Everstone, so it wouldn't be that difficult to fix. If we include Pokemon with unique signature items, there is also Snorlax.

 

[FMD]

Exclaimer
Maxim
Mowtom
Ooraloo
smashlloyd20
Someoneelse

 

[Exclaimer]

What should be done about Rare Candy Necturna?
C) Rare Candy boosts both her Atk and SpDef by 1. (remove the special clause from Rare Candy's description)

If A or B wins, should this precedent apply to other 23 BRT Pokemon?
B) No.

 

[Mowtom]

What should be done about Rare Candy Necturna?
C) Rare Candy boosts both her Atk and SpDef by 1. (remove the special clause from Rare Candy's description)

If A or B wins, should this precedent apply to other 23 BRT Pokemon?
A) Yes.

I really really like consistency. If we end up being inconsistent I want to be consistently inconsistent.

 

[FMD]

What should be done about Rare Candy Necturna?
C) Rare Candy boosts both her Atk and SpDef by 1. (remove the special clause from Rare Candy's description)

If A or B wins, should this precedent apply to other 23 BRT Pokemon?
B) No.

Consistency is nice, but I would rather this happen as infrequently as possible.

 

[Ooraloo]

Buffed Necturna? RIP Water Gym.

What should be done about Rare Candy Necturna?
C) Rare Candy boosts both her Atk and SpDef by 1. (remove the special clause from Rare Candy's description)

Majority on C, which makes the second question moot.