Ok, but how do you decide if the pokemon's impact on the battle was inconclusive? If I wanted to post my own logs, I'd want to know this, because if luck occurred too much in a certain battle to make the pokemon in question dominate, or crash, I'm not sure if that'd be seen as inconclusive or not.
Also, one thing, wouldn't it be better to see if something dominates in the hands of inexperienced players, rather than experienced players? What I mean is that, and experienced player can usually dominate with several different kinds of pokemon, but an inexperienced player needs something especially strong to even have a chance at dominating against an experienced player.
It seems to me that in this case, giving the battle logs of the more inexperienced players (provided that they're using a standard-ish set) more weight, because if a pokemon can dominate in the hands of a newbie, then it's worth a lot more than an experienced battler using it. We could make some kind of thread for newbies to submit their logs, since a lot them like posting warstories with very little content anyway.
I dunno, perhaps in the next Official Battling 101 tourney, we should actually allow Wobb and such, and then we can analyze the newer players' logs. I wonder if BK still has the logs from the first tourney, because we can at least look at some stuff for Garchomp from those.
If you think of how long we would be analyzing logs for a certain debatable pokemon, the following proposal may work:
Let's say, for example, we analyze logs for a debatable pokemon for a month. I propose that we have something such as a de-merit point system. In that period of a month, it would need to reach 150 points to be banned to uber, depending on how much call there is for that pokemon to be banned. The logs would be categorized as follows:
Domination by the team with the debatable pokemon on it
An experienced player dominating a newbie - +1 point.
A player dominating an opponent of near-equal skill - +2 points
A newbie dominating an experienced player - +3 points
Domination by the team without the debatable pokemon on it against a team with the debatable on it
A newbie getting dominated by an experienced player - -1 point
A player getting dominated by a player of near-equal skill - -2 points
A experienced player getting dominated by a newbie - -3 points
Inconclusive
Too much hax - 0 points
Too close of a match - 0 points
This needs to go for the entire period of time allotted of course, because if a pokemon is able to reach over the point limit of 150 points, there's still a chance that they can lose more points to go back down. Wherever they end off, do what you will with them.