I don't have much to contribute to the topic, but are you familiar with Bayes' theorem?Christians make up about 80% of the American population AND prison population.
I don't have much to contribute to the topic, but are you familiar with Bayes' theorem?Christians make up about 80% of the American population AND prison population.
Well, I'm not expecting this to help resolve matters.These are my 2 cents in the discussion:
http://www.ouest-france.fr/apologie-du-terrorisme-un-lyceen-nantais-poursuivi-pour-un-dessin-3119401 (About the source)
For those who don't know French or have trouble understanding what Google Translate says:
http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/france-begins-jailing-people-ironic-comments
Double standards where?
PS. Before you start strawmanning, I am definitely opposed to killing, for whatever the reason.
But these is already happening. See: People being able to discriminate against gay folks under religious reasons.Otherwise you can practically muzzle everyone because they "hurt your religious/personal sentiments" or whatnot.
Just in case you don't know, Spain pays 800k+ euros every fucking year to keep those fuckheads happy. Fuckheads which btw do nothing at all, and if they do something, it's bad (the princess' boyfriend/husband/whatever, Iñaki Urdangarín, is a good example, as he is being judged now for tax frauds (he's probably just gonna bribe the living hell out of all the jury, but oh well, there's more bad things about them). The ex-king Juan Carlos too, better known as the elephant hunter). Considering how the current government is beign """"""""""""forced"""""""""""" (I want to emphasize on them quotation marks) to cut down money from education and public health, those 800k+ would prove really useful.Considering that in some countries the unemployment rate is of 25% (ie there are more than 5 million unemployed people in Spain) anti-immigration policies are no surprise. I'm not saying immigration is the reason for that, but those policies are understandable in the current situation.
Nationalism and other extremist parties' support has risen due to the crisis, and as we all know, it's in those kind of desperate situations and crisis when people start leaning toward extremisms. Anti-Islamisation and nationalism are just some examples, in Spain it's anti-catholicism, independentism and anti-monarchism (that one is stupid btw -.-) for example.
This!A Muslim's Response to the 25,000 Anti-Islam Protesters in Germany
- "Dear 25,000 Anti-Islam Dresden Protesters and Pegida,
I hear you marched in your thousands against my religion. Last week, and last month. You marched against immigrants, foreigners, and anyone a shade darker. I will not draw comparisons to Nazi Germany. I will not call you bigots, I will not insult you, and I will not label you. But we do have a problem.
You marched with banners claiming your city is overcrowded with Muslims. Yet 0.1% of Dresden are Muslim. You marched claiming immigrants are cramming your schools and leaving your children to travel miles for an education. Yet 2.5% of Dresden are foreign-born.
You claim that Germany is being invaded by Muslims. Yet only 5% of Germans are Muslim.
You march "against the Islamization of the West". Yet within a century containing two World Wars, the decolonisation process, countless civil conflicts, foreign intervention, globalisation, and further displacement, Muslims remain a fringe minority in Europe. Less than 6%. A pretty lousy colonisation process, no?
You marched against refugees and asylum seekers, claiming Germany is their target for welfare and social security. Yet according to UNHCR, there are 51.2million refugees worldwide. Germany caters for less than 0.01% of them. Is that too much to ask? Is such a humanitarian obligation too large for the Refugee Convention 1951 your government ratified? Or is it actually punitive, for example, in comparison to Lebanon where every fourth person is a Syrian refugee?
Protesters, you are not alone. In my country, Britain, we have our own anti-immigration party. Ukip won their first seat in Clacton with nothing but anti-migrant rhetoric. Yet only 4.3% of Clacton are foreign-born. In a Parliamentary-based system, where each constituency elects a representative to voice their views, there is nothing Ukip can do for the people of Clacton.
Do you see a pattern? Perhaps I should explain. Your kind tend to establish themselves where their "problem" does not actually exist. Is this therefore an issue of negative perception? Fear of the unfamiliar? Intolerance in ignorance? Scapegoating an underclass? Media misinformation?
I will elaborate. London has a 36.2% foreign-born population. Relatively, that is fifteen times the population of foreigners in Dresden. A far greater diversity. Ukip poll the lowest in London compared to the rest of the country- in every demographic, foreign or not. London is a metropolis of brown, black, and white working side by side. We thrive. I saw an atheist today. Guess what? I did not try to convert him nor behead him for blasphemy; I helped him off the bus. He was 74 years old.
Does that make sense?
Your only insight into Islam is a box in your living room. Confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance infest the information you expose yourself to. Information which dehumanises and polarises anyone unlike you.
You enjoy the far-right media portrayal of Islam. It makes you feel good. Superior. Better. The barbaric Muslims, we are. We disrespect women, and we impose our beliefs on to others.
Yet did you know that Turkey, Indonesia, and Bangladesh, all Muslim majority states have had more elected female heads of state than almost every other Western country? Did you know that the Quran explicitly says "there is no compulsion in religion" (2:256), and our Prophet clarified "whomever hurts a non-Muslim will not smell a whiff of paradise"?
Did you know that your twisted misrepresentation of my religion helps the terrorists? Did you know that you and the terrorists agree on what seems to form an integral part of your identity: that Islam is violent? Did you know that you even use the same methodology to proclaim this; taking a verse out of context and evading any intellectual discourse?
What are Muslims to you, anyway? Arabs? Less than 20% of us are Arab. Indian or Pakistani? Again, less than 20%. Turkish? Less than 5%. Nothing else? That is more than half of us you cannot identify.
You assume our identity by our race. Is it not disheartening to you that such a narrow world view is legitimately held by so many? Does it not display a perspective so constrained to the contents of immediate life and prejudice? Is that not likely to lead to ignorant assumptions and offence in face of what is unbeknownst?
What becomes of the German Muslim, I wonder? Is he spared because he is white? Or is he declared a traitor and shunned? Is it difficult to choose between racism and neglecting a fellow countryman? Choose neither. Choose education. Tolerance. Kindness.
Detach from the vicious cycle of far-right media (who are unfamiliar with foreigners) feeding the far-right populace (who are unfamiliar with foreigners) what they should think about foreigners.
I ask you, have you ever met a Muslim? "Met" is not a synonym for shouting abuse at or stabbing to death in or outside their home. No, have you ever sat with a Muslim? Talked to a Muslim? Worked with a Muslim?
You should. At an airport perhaps, where we are 42 times more likely to be searched, and thus declared safe for human interaction."
Sincerely,
A Real-Life Muslim (not the ones on TV)
Just in case you don't know, Spain pays 800k+ euros every fucking year to keep those fuckheads happy. Fuckheads which btw do nothing at all, and if they do something, it's bad (the princess' boyfriend/husband/whatever, Iñaki Urdangarín, is a good example, as he is being judged now for tax frauds (he's probably just gonna bribe the living hell out of all the jury, but oh well, there's more bad things about them). The ex-king Juan Carlos too, better known as the elephant hunter). Considering how the current government is beign """"""""""""forced"""""""""""" (I want to emphasize on them quotation marks) to cut down money from education and public health, those 800k+ would prove really useful.
If you have your hopes on the current government doing shit about it and enforcing laws, better dump it all in getting an unicorn. Seems way more likelyI live in Spain, of course I know that. The point is that it's not necessary to change the system to cut down those expenses, we just need to actually enforce the laws and of course reduce the payment the royal family receives (I mean it doesn't really make sense that the cousin of the king gets money). Changing that is extremely easy to do, if politicians actually wanted to do it (they don't for some reason...), whereas changing the whole Constitution just to become a Republic is really costly and extremely time consuming (changing those parts of the Constitution is a lengthy process, and Spain has a lot of things to worry about atm like unemployment and external debt, which would have to be left unsolved while the Constitution is being changed).
When did I say that? And what does anything I said have to do with not changing the government?If you have your hopes on the current government doing shit about it and enforcing laws, better dump it all in getting an unicorn. Seems way more likely