So I'm here to talk about how the sample teams' OP credits teams.
For the ADV teams I've been pretty pushy about crediting arrangements as "various users" or in other words "this team is ingrained into the tier, is an intuitive build, has been built by a variety of players without collusion, similar builds will default to this arrangement" or however else you may want to communicate that idea. The two teams I provided since this thread started I credited to "various users" and was thinking about a push for the Standard Shedinja team to also be credited to "various users" since that's pretty much the simplest way to utilize Shedinja and there's not much room for deviation (even has the word standard in the team name).
So I guess this is the question: will we always just credit a team to the first person that posts it in this thread?
I guess you can already see what I'm getting at here. What happens if a user posts a team in this thread that another user was known for building and using in a tour, or what if a user posts a team that another user already posted in the team workshop, and so on. Will this thread just credit the user that posted it, will the OP be attuned enough to realize that the team "belongs" (whatever that means) to another user, will both users be credited, or will it just be credited to "various users"?
Classic HO presents an interesting challenge as to how ORAS teams have been credited. This team is currently credited to Fireburn and the ORAS council. It is credited this way because Fireburn happened to be the first user to post it in the sample teams thread and the council has made altercations since. This team was posted formally, in an RMT, by a user that isn't Fireburn or a member of the ORAS council before Fireburn posted it in sample teams. In other words, there is a precedent for crediting a team to the first poster in this thread, rather than the first user to put it in writing.
Here's a thought experiment: let's say you made a team for another user, either through B101, the teambuilding workshop, or whatever. That user then utilized the team for a short period of time and found it strong enough that they wanted to post in this thread. The team is accepted and the user that posted the team is credited rather than the creator. Are we okay with doing this? Does the "owner" of the team get to object? Do we credit both users, just the creator, or do we just say "various users" and drop the idea that this team was created by someone for a purpose at some point.
My motivation for bringing this up is because of how the Mega Lucario HO was treated by the OP and because it makes me wonder how this thread will approach crediting ORAS teams in the future. The team provided by Theultimate12 was RMTed here. I rated this team as I do with many others, but this time I posted my variant of the team as reference material at the end of my rate. Look familiar? The Mega Lucario HO that was added to the OP is mon for mon the exact team my Mega Lucario HO is and has been. The team that was added to the OP is not the team provided by Theultimate12 in this thread, or the one in his RMT, but is the team I provided. Yet, the team is credited to the poster and the council rather than the user that originally posted it.
Of course it's possible that the ORAS council was completely unaware of this RMT or my rate and defaulted the arrangement to what I had already proposed. Obviously many arrangements in Pokemon are intuitive after all and I don't believe they can be "owned" by any single person. You can argue though that there is more going on in this case however. What's more troubling is if the council would notice if a rated team was directly lifted without having it brought up by the creator of the RMT, after all they didn't notice this event, despite more than half of the current ORAS council being active in RMT / RMT staff when I posted that rate.
I bring all of this up mainly because I wonder how we're going to credit the ORAS builds that deserve to be on the OP but just haven't been posted yet. Are we going to just credit the first person that posts them, or the first person that posts the definitive version, or the first person to have posted the team elsewhere on Smogon?
Just some things for the contributors of this thread to consider.
~
For the ADV teams I've been pretty pushy about crediting arrangements as "various users" or in other words "this team is ingrained into the tier, is an intuitive build, has been built by a variety of players without collusion, similar builds will default to this arrangement" or however else you may want to communicate that idea. The two teams I provided since this thread started I credited to "various users" and was thinking about a push for the Standard Shedinja team to also be credited to "various users" since that's pretty much the simplest way to utilize Shedinja and there's not much room for deviation (even has the word standard in the team name).
So I guess this is the question: will we always just credit a team to the first person that posts it in this thread?
I guess you can already see what I'm getting at here. What happens if a user posts a team in this thread that another user was known for building and using in a tour, or what if a user posts a team that another user already posted in the team workshop, and so on. Will this thread just credit the user that posted it, will the OP be attuned enough to realize that the team "belongs" (whatever that means) to another user, will both users be credited, or will it just be credited to "various users"?
Classic HO presents an interesting challenge as to how ORAS teams have been credited. This team is currently credited to Fireburn and the ORAS council. It is credited this way because Fireburn happened to be the first user to post it in the sample teams thread and the council has made altercations since. This team was posted formally, in an RMT, by a user that isn't Fireburn or a member of the ORAS council before Fireburn posted it in sample teams. In other words, there is a precedent for crediting a team to the first poster in this thread, rather than the first user to put it in writing.
Here's a thought experiment: let's say you made a team for another user, either through B101, the teambuilding workshop, or whatever. That user then utilized the team for a short period of time and found it strong enough that they wanted to post in this thread. The team is accepted and the user that posted the team is credited rather than the creator. Are we okay with doing this? Does the "owner" of the team get to object? Do we credit both users, just the creator, or do we just say "various users" and drop the idea that this team was created by someone for a purpose at some point.
My motivation for bringing this up is because of how the Mega Lucario HO was treated by the OP and because it makes me wonder how this thread will approach crediting ORAS teams in the future. The team provided by Theultimate12 was RMTed here. I rated this team as I do with many others, but this time I posted my variant of the team as reference material at the end of my rate. Look familiar? The Mega Lucario HO that was added to the OP is mon for mon the exact team my Mega Lucario HO is and has been. The team that was added to the OP is not the team provided by Theultimate12 in this thread, or the one in his RMT, but is the team I provided. Yet, the team is credited to the poster and the council rather than the user that originally posted it.
Of course it's possible that the ORAS council was completely unaware of this RMT or my rate and defaulted the arrangement to what I had already proposed. Obviously many arrangements in Pokemon are intuitive after all and I don't believe they can be "owned" by any single person. You can argue though that there is more going on in this case however. What's more troubling is if the council would notice if a rated team was directly lifted without having it brought up by the creator of the RMT, after all they didn't notice this event, despite more than half of the current ORAS council being active in RMT / RMT staff when I posted that rate.
I bring all of this up mainly because I wonder how we're going to credit the ORAS builds that deserve to be on the OP but just haven't been posted yet. Are we going to just credit the first person that posts them, or the first person that posts the definitive version, or the first person to have posted the team elsewhere on Smogon?
Just some things for the contributors of this thread to consider.
~