Okay, so presumably you don't use Blissey because it has incredible SpD but crap Def, or you don't use Gengar because it has incredible SpA but crap Atk, or you don't use Skarmory because it has incredible Def but crap SpD, or you don't use Gyarados because it has incredible Atk but crap SpA.
If your point, however, is "Fighting Pokemon should have a great Atk stat", then you've obviously haven't understood what breaking the mold means. Yeah, all Fighting Pokemon have a great Atk stat... which is precisely why I'm suggesting to go against that and make one with crap Atk and great SpA!
When all has been said and done, though, it's not like I'm defending a type that's been voted all that much anyway. When I see what people have voted so far, I see Electric and Rock being mentioned much more than Fighting. So what are you saying exactly? That I want this Pokemon to be Fighting-type at all costs? Lol. If you don't know, I've been voting here regularly since Revenankh and my suggestions and votes here have almost always lost. (Me suggesting Fighting in this poll will probably be another addition to my long list of 'failures'.) I suggested a new move that very few people wanted it. I suggested removing certain moves from a few existing Pokemon's movepools, and people didn't want to (even though I still believe to this day that this measure would benefit CAP). I suggested many other things here that I don't remember and that lost. But the very fact that I barely remember what they are means that I took most of the adverse votes in my stride and moved on.
I'm not one that manipulates votes, for sure. Maybe you said that because you envy me, I don't know, but seriously I'm flabbergasted by such a comment.
