Apologies yet again for the delay, been talking with both the tiering council and active people in this thread / the Ubers Discord to try and reach a solution, and I think there's a very simple one that can end this process soon. The idea is for a new tiering survey to be made, with weighted options based on preference. While in the last one banning the move won, it was close and didn't win out over all other options combined so it wasn't a true majority. The weighted survey will help solve that by giving people secondary options if they weren't confident their first choice would win or if they'd prefer a secondary option over what they picked rather than just the next highest voted (ex. someone who voted limit the users to 1 might rather banning the move rather than another complex option of the ingrain clause, and vise versa for full ban voters).
If anyone has input on this process I'll gladly hear out all opinions, we're closing in on this thread that admittedly I've been lackluster at running but the mistakes have been fixed and with community input we can come to a majority conclusion.
The result with the highest average placing will be what's suspect tested under the current idea.
It gives the most accurate "majority" option based on what people would settle for, and this realistically fixes all the problems I've heard with the initial survey. The final piece of input is whether or not to just remove the ninjask + bp clause option outright due to the incredibly low support, but it would never hurt to leave in, although the first stage could be considered a "run off" vote where the least popular one by a longshot got eliminated.
I plan on starting this within 1 week or sooner if there's no input, and then the survey would be up for again around 1 week with the vote following shortly after. Thanks everyone for their patience, and if this all goes smoothly this will be the solution that works best for everyone.
If anyone has input on this process I'll gladly hear out all opinions, we're closing in on this thread that admittedly I've been lackluster at running but the mistakes have been fixed and with community input we can come to a majority conclusion.
The result with the highest average placing will be what's suspect tested under the current idea.
It gives the most accurate "majority" option based on what people would settle for, and this realistically fixes all the problems I've heard with the initial survey. The final piece of input is whether or not to just remove the ninjask + bp clause option outright due to the incredibly low support, but it would never hurt to leave in, although the first stage could be considered a "run off" vote where the least popular one by a longshot got eliminated.
I plan on starting this within 1 week or sooner if there's no input, and then the survey would be up for again around 1 week with the vote following shortly after. Thanks everyone for their patience, and if this all goes smoothly this will be the solution that works best for everyone.