This suspect's point is to determine if Kyurem is broken in SV OU or not; it has nothing to do with how Kyurem may or may not balance Rain (or Rain Pokemon like Archaludon). If that is an issue, it will be dealt with separately. If it is not, it will not be dealt with. Of course, if you think Kyurem is balanced, then you should absolutely lean towards no ban and I think that's plenty valid. But the whole Rain sub-argument is silly.
You can vote based off of whatever you would like if you get voting reqs of course -- people have the right to do that and this right should always be upheld, but, in my eyes and in the intention of the tiering system, these arguments are and will continue to be lackluster. Conditional tiering without future assurance just leads to broken-checking-broken and hyperfocused/centralized tiers.
In my opinion, Kyurem is broken due to the lack of counterplay and how it warps teambuilding, so I will vote ban for the reasons cited in the suspect thread in my posts here. I also believe Archaludon is worthy of a suspect test in the aftermath of this suspect test, but that is the case regardless of the Kyurem verdict and is another discussion for another day in the near future.
You can vote based off of whatever you would like if you get voting reqs of course -- people have the right to do that and this right should always be upheld, but, in my eyes and in the intention of the tiering system, these arguments are and will continue to be lackluster. Conditional tiering without future assurance just leads to broken-checking-broken and hyperfocused/centralized tiers.
In my opinion, Kyurem is broken due to the lack of counterplay and how it warps teambuilding, so I will vote ban for the reasons cited in the suspect thread in my posts here. I also believe Archaludon is worthy of a suspect test in the aftermath of this suspect test, but that is the case regardless of the Kyurem verdict and is another discussion for another day in the near future.